Editors
| Editor-in-Chief: | , Georgia State University |
|---|---|
| Editorial Board: | Available at http://www.misq.org/archivist/editor.html |
A peer reviewed scholarly journal, the editorial objective of the MIS Quarterly is the enhancement and communication of knowledge concerning the development of IT-based services, the management of IT resources, and the use, impact, and economics of IT with managerial, organizational, and societal implications. Professional issues affecting the IS field as a whole are also in the purview of the journal.
2007 Impact Factor of this journal: 5.826
Current Issue: Volume 32, Issue 4 (2008)
Articles
Table of Contents, Volume 32, Issue 4 (December 2008) -- Special Issue on Design Science Research
MIS Quarterly
Marshaling the Professional Experience of Doctoral Students: A Contribution to the Practical Relevance Debate
Heinz K. Klein and Frantz Rowe
A Fast Form Approach to Measuring Technology Acceptance and Other Constructs
Wynne W. Chin, Norman Johnson, and Andrew Schwarz
Buyer Intention to Use Internet-Enabled Reverse Auctions: The Role of Asset Specificity, Product Specialization, and Non-Contractibility
Sunil Mithas, Joni L. Jones, and Will Mitchell
Design Science in the Information Systems Discipline: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Design Science Research
Salvatore T. March and Veda C. Storey
The Design Theory Nexus
Jan Pries-Heje and Richard L. Baskerville
Process Grammar as a Tool for Business Process Design
Jintae Lee, George M. Wyner, and Brian T. Pentland
Making Sense of Technology Trends in the Information Technology Landscape: A Design Science Approach
Gediminas Adomavicius, Jesse C. Bockstedt, Alok Gupta, and Robert J. Kauffman
CyberGrate: A Design Framework and System for Text Analysis of Computer-Mediated Communication
Ahmed Abbasi and Hsinchun Chen
Using Cognitive Principles to Guide Classification in Information Systems Modeling
Jeffrey Parsons and Yair Wand
Subject Index, Volume 32
MIS Quarterly
Editorials
Editor's Comments: Readability and the Relevance Versus Rigor Debate
Detmar W. Straub and Soon Ang